Human activities have a negative effect on plant and animal species. Some people say that it is too late to do anything. Some people think that we should take effective action to improve the situation. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

There are controversial perspectives heating a debate whether to handle environmental degradation and loss of biodiversity which are caused by improper human activities. While some claim that people don’t have enough time to do anything, the opposite makes a statement that we can enhance the situation by taking a lot of efficacious measures. I would contend that the former is valid to some extent but I consider myself an advocate of the latter. Without a shadow of a doubt, some equivalent reasons lead to the claim that it is too late to deal with the undesirable impact on flora and fauna of

humans

. In the long run, the devastation that meets the ever-growing demand of the greedy human wishes brings unfavourable influences on the deterioration in environmental quality and breed habitat destruction.

Hence

, a wide range of animals are on the verge of extinction and even die off.

For instance

, pandas in China are on the brink of extinction due to the shortage of their proper habitat.

As a result

, a lot of people think that

humans

can’t do anything to cope with

this

problem. While the consequences of inappropriate

humans

’ activities are widely acknowledged, there are some resolutions to enhance

this

problem. The Government could invest in constructing an eclectic mix of reservations to create safe habitats and protect endangered species.

For instance

, Viet Nam’s authorities have made an investment in Cuc Phuong Forest, which houses a wealth of rare animals.

Thus

, it is not too late to find a solution to

this

problem. To sum up,

although

some people believe

humans

couldn’t resolve the consequences of their activities on the environment, I think

humans

could take measures to improve environmental quality and biodiversity.