Some people believe famous people's support towards international aid organizations draws attention to problems. Others think celebrities make the problem less important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion .

Nowadays, In the cinematic

world

Add a comma

,world

show examples

most

celebrities

support overseas aid organizations. Some

people

believe that

this

is drawing more attention to problems.

In contrast

, Other thinks that the appearance of

celebrities

are mostly for publicity and that makes the real problem less important. I think that to some instinct, a

celebrities

presence is not good for any international organization, but

that is

not true in every scenario. We will discuss both views here.

Firstly

, If any institution or firm make any actor or actress a brand ambassador,

then

it is definitely going to draw the attention of

people

. Most

people

or fans follow their paths and

that is

actually good for that overseas aid organizations.

For example

,

one

well-known actress has started raising funds for

one

child who is suffering from some deadliest diseases and she was actually able to save that child by providing millions of amounts to the parents. On the other side, some

celebrities

are only doing things to increase their popularity in the world. They only do some good works to show off and nothing for gaining the attention of

people

towards the real issue.

For example

, some

celebrities

went to

one

anti-national institute while a protest was going on, and

that is

also

just before their movie is going to release.

This

was clearly a publicity stunt and he or she has actually faced so much hatred for

this

act. Now, if he does something good

then

also

no

one

appreciates him as

people

think that everything he does is for showoff only. To conclude, not all the actors and actresses are doing social work for fame but they actually wanted to serve the nation by good work. But yes both kind of

people

exists in the world.