Some people believe government should spend more money in saving languages of few speaker from dying completely. Other think this is a waste of financial resourses. Discuss both view and give opinion.

Due to globalization,
languages
are more unified.
This
result in losing inheritors of some minority
languages
.
Thus
, there has been a controversial debate on whether the government should spend money to rescue the dying
languages
. While some people are violently opposed to
this
idea and consider it is a waste of financial
resources
. Both views will be discussed below followed by a personal opinion. To commence with,
languages
is the reflection of a culture. It contains the history and background of the community, which
also
carry many connotations and connections.
Therefore
, it is worthy for the government to spend more money in order to protect and promote the dying
languages
, as well as rescue them from forfeit. The promotion can keep the cultures diversification and ensure the civilization being spread.
On the contrary
, others think the financial
resources
should be spent on something more important.
For example
, more money should be put into education or the environment in order to maintain productivity and living standards. As
languages
are a component of soft power, still hard power is usually preferable to soft power.
Therefore
, the growth of the country may be more important than the language. And
as a result
, other elements
such
as education, infrastructure rather than
languages
should be funded. In conclusion, language may be the concentration of a culture and it has a deep connection with society. Whereas other components can
also
be necessary for the country. In my opinion, protecting
languages
is not a waste of financial
resources
as cultures can give citizens a sense of belonging in society.
Therefore
, rational spending will not be a burden on financial
resources
but can bring people back together.
Submitted by hhhhelen.poon on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: