It is argued
by Change preposition
show examples
certain individuals that spending
improves a nation's economic status
others believe that saving does that better. Personally, I opine that keeping
for later
builds a
's
since more
will be financially stable.
in
essay, I will tackle both these views and provide a conclusion.
First and foremost, putting
to
ensures that more of it remains in circulation.
, because a lot of
spend
, it accords the masses more chances to get hold of it and
reduces the burden of being broke.
in itself is a plus for a
's
because not only does the
boost but
its inflation rate reduces significantly. Take,
,
in Change preposition
show examples
a survey conducted on the benefits of having more
spending their
, it was determined that the inflation rate reduced by more than 89 per cent as opposed to when they were saving. In the long run,
influences a
's
positively.
, taking
route oftentimes results in more broke
as
nonCorrect your spelling
show examples
would have kept anything for future
. Based on
fact, I feel spending more does not help a
's
at all
, when a lot of
keep the
for future
, it enables them to undertake projects that they would
not have been able to do under normal circumstances. To put
in perspective, it is only when the masses save
that they
wouldWrong verb form
show examples
be able to build new houses or start a new business with a higher amount from their savings.
,
the low-income
are currently earning, most of them are unable to start a company unless they get a loan or credit card which
cripples the
's
. The opposite is true when
have been saving.
, saving at times takes
out of circulation as
will rarely be using it. Yet, that can be overcome by restricting the amount and period one can save.
By way of conclusion, I reaffirm my position that storing
for future
is better than just using it anyhow. The latter only works as a temporal method of improving a
's economic status
saving is
long termAdd a hyphen
show examples
in
regard.