Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree?

According to the justice system , which has been practising for centuries , a
jury
in a criminal case has not given the past criminal reports of offenders due to various reasons.
Although
some lawyers try to change
this
,
this
could give bad impressions to the
jury
about the defendant as well as , it could lead to injustice due to the preoccupied mind of the
jury
.
Hence
,
this
writer is in complete disagreement to change
this
low .
To begin
with , when we consider the
jury
system in countries , it may contain different professionals and people in society.
furthermore
, they are supposed to give their opinion on a very fair mind, by concerning evidence from both parties .
However
, if they knew about the
defender
's past criminal reports, they can preoccupy their minds about the
defender
and
this
may lead to injustice .
For example
, according to a report published by a famous psychiatrist in England , if someone has a bad impression of a particular person , it would be very difficult to change their mind even if the person is innocent . At the same time , if the
jury
knew the past records of the
defender
, the community would think about the gravity of the past criminals of the person and they may think about the past charges against him .
this
could lead to relate
this
present situation of the
defender
to the past and,
unfortunately
Add a comma
,unfortunately
show examples
he could receive injustice even though he is innocent on both occasions . In conclusion , even though some people are against not giving past records of a
defender
to the
jury
,
this
has protected defenders' rights for decades and it is justifiable .
Hence
,
this
writer is in complete agreement with the fact that the
jury
should not reseved the past records of a
defender
before giving a decision about him.
Submitted by mngldissanayaka on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: