Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Some people believe that environmental issues should be solved globally while

rest

Correct article usage

the rest

show examples

of them supports dealing with them nationally. Nowadays, there are so many incidental

problems

in our environment. We encounter them each day, almost in every

steps

Change to a singular noun

step

show examples

. So, peoples

of

Change preposition

apply

show examples

all over the world are in the process of finding solutions

for

Change preposition

to

show examples

these

problems

. We have two ways

for

Change preposition

of

show examples

recovering

this

Change preposition

from this

show examples

situation: One of them is by groups of several countries

Correct your spelling

detailed

dealed

Correct your spelling

dealt

show examples

working together on it, and another one is solving

this

in states, not globally. Each approach has its own pros and cons, on one side. But both have

a

Change the article

the

show examples

same ambition.

That is

why it is acceptable and effective, whether reaching the aim among countries or in a single nation. There is an opportunity

selecting

Change the verb form

to select

show examples

many thoughts to easily find a solution for the

problems

. In

this

case, we should work collectively with other communities. The more ideas we have, the more chances we will get.

On the other hand

, it is

also

true

Add an article

a true

show examples

fact that

particular

Correct article usage

a particular

show examples

country has its private environmental position that only

this

nation knows and can obtain their best result on those

problems

.

However

, from my point of view, strength is in unity. So, global movement is the best way for our purpose.