Parents and teachers make many rules for children to encourage good behaviour and protect them from danger. However, children would benefit from fewer rules and greater freedom. To what extent do you agree and disagree?

It is undeniable fact, that making

rules

for human beings is a good way to guide them. So the guardians and teachers create various

rules

and regulations for the kids to teach them good etiquette and save them from detrimental uncertainties, while fewer limitations and more

freedom

, can be proven better for the children. I partly agree with

this

statement. I will discuss my views in the following fragments.

First

of all, putting

restrictions

on kids can give them a better future. The age of the minority is the age of learning. At

this

age, a child does not know much about the good and bad things. They are unaware of the evilness of the world. One wrong step can spoil their whole life. So they get knowledge by following the seniors in the society and learning various aspects of the life. Rather than

this

, more

freedom

, fewer

restrictions

, develop their creativity. Following

rules

means putting themselves under

restrictions

and one can not look and think outside these boundaries. Just follow a single line, which is pulled by the elders.

This

can spoil an innovative mind of a child. Due to ,

this

we can lose the highly talented people from our community, who can change the world with their thoughts and ideas. To cap it up, limitations are good for minors but only to a certain limit.

Instead

of just saying to them, we should

also

start, listening to them.

Freedom

in certain areas is

also

required to them for their development, in place of putting

restrictions

. So there should be a need for balance between the

rules

and

freedom

for holistic development.