Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is believed that those who would opt for an early

career

and can cling to it for a longer time can get a more satisfying

career

life than those who frequently change their

jobs

. It is hard for many to agree or disagree with the statement. On the one hand, those who prefer the

first

option are seen as pretty confident in their

career

. They are seen marking their imprints in their

work

environment, and

this

makes them an integral part of the firm.

For example

, an accountant in a company can make his

work

smoother and more comfortable when he stays longer in the post. Apart from job security,

this

is beneficial to him by means of promotions, incentives and other types of rewards. The company

also

benefitted from the experienced service of

this

person. The only challenge here is to tolerate the numerous crises, all through the

work

period.

On the other hand

, those who would change their

jobs

frequently would mostly select better

jobs

than their previous job. They can make their profession more prosperous by opting for better remunerations when compared to an established employee.

However

, in most cases, these people would find it hard to adjust to the changing

work

situations. Another drawback is that most employers hesitate to accept employees who change their

jobs

too frequently. To conclude, when an employee who stays longer in a firm makes an imprint in his firm, those who change

jobs

frequently can benefit in other ways.

Therefore

, it is difficult to say which option is better for a successful

career

life.