Some people think that the best way to reduce the time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters, but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

A highly controversial issue today relates to whether

replacing

Change the verb form

to replace

show examples

green

areas

with residential

areas

for commuters. In

this

essay, I am going to examine

this

question from both

point

Change to a plural noun

points

show examples

of

views

Fix the agreement mistake

view

show examples

and

then

explain why I believe removing parks and gardens in the centre of

city

Add an article

the city

show examples

cannot be the best way to reduce

time saving

Add a hyphen

time-saving

show examples

solution

Fix the agreement mistake

solutions

show examples

for commuters. There are many people who argue that the benefits of a number of residential buildings near

Correct your spelling

workplaces

show examples

work places

Correct your spelling

workplaces

show examples

in the

city

outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for believing

this

is by having a lot of residential places, workers can reduce their

time

and money while on their way to

work place

Correct your spelling

workplace

show examples

. It is

also

possible to say that the government do not need

to

Correct your spelling

too

show examples

much

Correct quantifier usage

apply

show examples

care about extending the rail stations or bus routes for commuters.

This

may allow the government to save tax budget on building infrastructure for citizens.

On the other hand

, others believe that removing eco-friendly

area

Fix the agreement mistake

areas

show examples

in order to make residential

areas

for

Add an article

the citizen

a citizen

show examples

citizen

Fix the agreement mistake

citizens

show examples

who have jobs in the

city

cannot be the best idea to reduce commute

time

for them. It is often argued that the government would rather tackle

this

problem more efficiently with some companies

such

as by giving subsidiaries to let them encouraging to have work from

system

Add an article

the system

show examples

more than now than removing parks or

garden

Fix the agreement mistake

gardens

show examples

in

city

Add an article

the city

show examples

. To sum up, I believe that both arguments have their merits. On balance,

however

, I feel that changing the green

areas

to residential building

areas

are

Correct subject-verb agreement

is

show examples

not the best solution in order to save

commuter’s

Fix the agreement mistake

commuters’

show examples

time

.

This

is because

instead

of reducing greenery

areas

in

city

Add an article

the city

show examples

center

Change the spelling

centre

show examples

, there

are

Change the verb form

is

show examples

much more efficient

way

Fix the agreement mistake

ways

show examples

to deal with

this

problem.