The normal hours employees spend at work should be reduced to enhance the performance of labour system. Do you agree or disagree?

Perceived as an indispensable part of institutions, factories and organizations, blue- colours have a prominent role in society. There is a debate on whether should time-working of labourers arise, and to what extent performance will be changed. I believe that reduction in time-working by authorities serves the advantage for workplaces.

Firstly

, labour as an important force of all organizations reserve and exercise the right of doing their duties just in determining hours. Regardless of

this

unavoidable right, it would be better for workers don't be tired a lot because

this

fatigue will be contributed to lower precautions, and it will diminish the levels of concentration. So, needless to say, quality has been privileged over quantity always. From the

second

point of view, willingness and mental abilities of one at performance are remarkable points which should be taken into the notice. Creating

such

incentives may be effective in

this

regard. Reducing the time spent at work would be a proper reward for people by whom tasks will be completed in a prominent manner. Take

for instance

working as a chef in a restaurant by eliminating hours of effort just for a moment, high quality the task is expected. It means her/ his

to

Fix the infinitive

apply

show examples

tend to endeavour leads to desirable results. to sum up, I tend to think that

however

, a nine-

to-

Correct your spelling

to

show examples

five

job

Change to a plural noun

jobs

show examples

usually has its characteristics which are characterized by permanent hours and reduction in time at work leads to better quality. Despite the fact that

this

aforementioned factor entails sensible managerial decisions, it would be materialized provided that workers insist on comprehensively.