In many cities, planners tend to arrange shops, schools, offices and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

There are plenty of
city
planners who consider that diverse functional buildings should be divided into different places
instead
of gathering them together. From my perspective, it is not a reasonable suggestion because its gains can not compensate for its costs. It is true that if we separate functional buildings,
such
as supermarkets, libraries, and executive institutions, into different concerns of
cities
, the
cities
can get a lot of benefits.
For example
, in a
multi-center
Change the spelling
multi-centre
show examples
city
, residents have to go to diverse areas of
this
city
to deal with their issues rather than gather in one
city
center
Change the spelling
centre
show examples
, so the heavy traffic would be moderated, given the traffic jam which is brought by the high-density population is a typical problem of modern
cities
, it is a good idea to build the
multi-center
Change the spelling
multi-centre
show examples
city
.
However
, Since the building of a
multi-center
Change the spelling
multi-centre
show examples
city
requires a huge amount of money to build transportation infrastructures to connect different parts of the
city
, the cost of building
this
kind of
city
is unaffordable for most local governments, particularly for small
cities
.
Moreover
, if the building of
multi-center
Change the spelling
multi-centre
show examples
cities
runs out of the limited budget of local governments, other essential public services,
for example
, the investment in educational institutions, will be underfunded, which is not a positive thing for the development of a
city
in a long term. From the above discussions, it is clear to see that the gains of building a
multi-center
Change the spelling
multi-centre
show examples
city
can not outweigh its cost of it. To sum up, even if separating functional buildings of a
city
would generate some benefits, the huge cost of
this
proposal prevents it from becoming a reasonable choice for many
cities
.
Submitted by w1274991789 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: