increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution problems To what extent do u agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

Some folks consider that raising
fuel
costs is the most effective measure to curb
traffic
jams and environmental
pollution
.
However
, I don’t agree with
this
view and will give examples to prove the fallacy of
this
opinion. Improving public transport and effective implementation of
traffic
rules
are some ways to tackle
this
problem. Rather than solving any problem, increasing petrol charges has a negative effect on people's pockets.
Fuel
is required for transportation of everything that we use in daily life
such
as goods, vegetables, medicines, work commute etc. An increase in petrol price only results in people having to shell out extra money to meet their daily demands. To exemplify, though
fuel
prices
have significantly increased all over the world in the
last
50 years,
traffic
jams and
pollution
have still risen to higher levels.
Additionally
, increased
fuel
prices
have resulted in rising inflation which has eaten up people’s savings.
Hence
, rising
fuel
prices
are not an effective way to tackle
traffic
and
pollution
.
On the other hand
, there are other methods available to fight against these issues. The
first
solution is to improve public transportation facilities
such
as local buses, metro etc, which would encourage folks to use them
instead
of their own vehicles as public transportation cause lesser per capita
pollution
and leads to fewer
traffic
jams.
For example
, the majority of individuals in big cities like Delhi prefer to use the metro as their main commuting medium because it saves them time and it is
also
beneficial for the overall society. The
second
measure is to enforce
traffic
rules
strictly as most people don’t follow
traffic
rules
where they can easily escape after violating road
rules
and regulations.
For instance
, heavy fines and challans are good ways to keep violators in check as they fear they can get caught with strict laws in place. To conclude, increasing
fuel
prices
is not effective to curb
traffic
and
pollution
issues as
fuel
is the lifeline of our modern society. Good public transport services and strict
traffic
rules
are better ways to fight these problems.
Submitted by mile.jasmeenkaur12 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Discourage
  • Incentivize
  • Alternative energy
  • Public transportation
  • Lower-income
  • Carpool
  • Ride-sharing
  • Congestion
  • Urban planning
  • Pedestrian-friendly
  • Tax incentives
  • Electric and hybrid vehicles
  • Emissions standards
  • Cleaner vehicles
  • Congestion charges
  • Bicycle lanes
  • Sustainable
What to do next:
Look at other essays: