Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

A significant number of

people

argue that

individuals

should be content with their actual

situation

,

meanwhile

Add a comma

,meanwhile

show examples

others believe

people

need to try their best to reach their satisfaction.

Although

I agree on seeking the best outcome possible, in

this

essay, I will discuss both standpoints. A great number of

people

are certain that it is unnecessary to improve someone's welfare and that it is better to accept what has already been given. Take

for example

Emile Zola, a famous determinist novelist that lived in the 1800s, who wrote novels about

people

of low class attempting to ameliorate their social rank, but eventually died in the process. While the protagonist was incessantly trying to pursue his goal, his health deteriorated which concluded in his death.

This

shows that

individuals

in order to achieve their dream or enhance their

situation

, ignore their well-being, and

consequently

die.

On the other hand

, there are

people

who firmly believe that

individuals

should try to ameliorate their situations in order to live fully.

For instance

, a major number of rappers come from underprivileged communities. They fully understand their families' struggles and desire to ameliorate the

situation

they live in,

therefore

, through their courage, mental strength and a great desire to enhance their own welfare, they succeed and raise their social status. In my opinion,

people

should have a goal and try to accomplish it to live life to its fullest. In conclusion, there are reasons why

people

believe it is inappropriate to change a

situation

while others do not. There is no right and no wrong, and

individuals

will choose their position based on their preconceptions.