Towns and cities are attractive places. Some people suggest that the government should spend money putting in more works of art like paintings and statues to make them better to live in. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many are of the belief that Developing and improving attractive places in

cities

are very important and governments have to spend more money and make more status, painting and special place in

cities

until the

cities

sound beautiful. while the majority of the individuals disagree with

this

issue for some reasons. there are rational arguments on both sides of

this

topic which will be discussed in detail, followed by my point of view. The

first

thing we face to that when enter to each

city

is the appearance of the

city

so it is very important that a

city

has special sculptures or beautiful paintings for citizens as well as tourists. It means they can provide a desirable appearance for the tourism industry that lead to more job opportunity and

then

more revenue from

this

subject. So governments and authorities should After careful evaluation and consider enough budget design and build new status and effort to improve the face of the

city

.

On the other hand

, the government is facing limited financial resources as well as priorities of responsibility

such

as health care system or environmental protection which most people think these duties are more important than the beautification of

cities

.

In addition

, they think,

Such

actions by the government could provide longer beneficial effects for people and even the

next

generation.

For instance

, a beautiful

city

with various attractive places or things If faced with a high crime rate, definitely, is not a good place for living

also

for tourists destination. In conclusion, if governments do other duty

also

have enough money and budget for crucial responsibility, I completely agree with

this

idea to have a beautiful

city

with more attractive status, painting and beautiful places.