The best curriculum is not one based on a static body of knowledge, but one which teaches students to cope with change. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Plenty of schools and educational institutes worldwide have been teaching obsolete

subjects

and concepts to generations. Many would argue that today's schools should focus more on adaptability than traditional, discrete

subjects

. In my opinion,

although

there is a strong

an

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

argument for

this

contention given the disruptive nature of modern industries, it is

nonetheless

essential to

preserving

Wrong verb form

preserve

show examples

the traditional role of

subjects

in a curriculum. I shall highlight my opinion in the upcoming paragraphs. Those who support

this

reform contend that the skills needed for modern workforces are changing rapidly. Past generations could rely on

subjects

learned in high school and university,

such

as those related to accounting, finance, and so on, providing lasting job security.

This

guarantee is less stable now

due to

advances in automation and technology. Human workers are being phased out of specific roles and jobs at many companies and replaced by cheap software.

Therefore

, schools should teach adaptable methods for handling change to help them cope with an uncertain future job market. Logically, most of the

subjects

,

such

as math, sciences, history, physical education, etc., will not yield practical skills used daily throughout life, which is the source of many later complaints about school curricula. An excellent example of

this

would be Steve Jobs's classes about calligraphy in university, which later informed the lasting design of computer interfaces and word processors. In conclusion, despite realistic employment apprehensions, it is indispensable for students to possess foundational knowledge about various disciplines.

Moreover

, a binary distinction between subject knowledge and flexible skills is not always essential.