In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

It is a common belief that essential to spend a large amount of money on building new railway lines for a high-speed railroad between cities.

However

, there is a more persuasive argument that finance should be spent on improving established public

transport

. On the one hand, The high-speed railroad has several advantages for our life that improve the logistics system, expand our life radius, and save time.

For example

, in old

times

, rail is used for logistics.

Moreover

, it is five

times

more efficient than road

transport

.

Therefore

, the fast trains could be more valuable than normal ones.

Therefore

, speed is proportional to time, which is, if speed is two

times

high, the distance where to go could be increased two

times

as well.

Accordingly

, our one-day life zone will

further

expand.

Nevertheless

, when we support improving established public

transport

. We gain more beneficial benefits than support to train. It is related to automobile pollution, job creation, and so on.

For instance

, undoubtedly, improved public

transport

affects the public transportation system.

Moreover

, it contributes to private car reduction that reduces traffic pollution and conservation of oil use and saves related tax.

By contrast

, the maintenance of public

transport

leads to job creation.

Therefore

, the public deserves to be offered an improved public

transport

system. To sum up, while it is apparent

of

Change preposition

apply

show examples

worth spending money on building a new railway for a high-speed railroad between cities. It is undeniable that more important is money spent on improving established public

transport

.