The best curriculum is not one based on a static body of knowledge, but one which teaches students to cope with change. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The younger generation is the future;

therefore

, they always obtain the world’s attention in a lot of spheres, especially in education. Some people say that the optimal academic programme should teach students how to adapt to adjustments

instead

of providing a fundamental source of

information

. I totally disagree with

this

argument, and I will explain the reasons in the following paragraphs.

First

, human

knowledge

was accumulated for ages. From the

first

generations, we were aware that

this

was a precious treasure that needed to be passed on to the

next

generations to help them develop and prospect, and

this

can be seen in a lot of evidence to show how we appreciated it.

For example

, in the way we have recorded it throughout human history. And due to

this

knowledge

and experience, we have avoided numerous disasters and achieved success in various fields,

such

as agriculture and industry.

Second

, to become an adult, children need to be given essential understandings and

skills

ranging from basic maths, science, and the natural environment to survival

skills

.

This

will help them easily integrate into the world and have opportunities to learn higher levels of

knowledge

,

such

as graduate or postgraduate. Admittedly, the world always changes.

As a result

, children should be taught new

skills

such

as computers and technology.

However

, it is hard to absorb

this

information

and

skills

without a basic source of

knowledge

. In conclusion, everyone needs static background

information

because it helps them understand the fundamental rules that govern the planet. Children should learn

this

information

in their curriculum at school before they learn any others.