The best way to make the road transport of goods safer is to ask drivers to take a driving test each year. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some today argue that the transportation of goods would be safer if
drivers
were required to take mandatory driving tests each year. In my opinion, Use synonyms
this
is not a realistic solution despite its potential benefits.
Those in favour of Linking Words
such
a reform point out that truck Linking Words
drivers
need these courses more than other motorists. After driving for many years, it is natural that individuals may forget certain rules and a course to refresh their knowledge of Use synonyms
road
safety and etiquette cannot possibly do any harm. Added to Use synonyms
this
is the fact that truck Linking Words
drivers
transporting goods are on the Use synonyms
road
far more than your average commuter. Use synonyms
Therefore
, it is logical that their ability to drive well will have an outsized impact on overall Linking Words
road
safety statistics. A truck driver who submits to yearly re-certification under Use synonyms
this
proposal is likely to have at least a superior formal understanding of driving laws.
Linking Words
However
, the effects of Linking Words
such
learning might be marginal and the program itself would be prohibitively expensive. Individuals who often drive might not be strictly following the rules they learned when they Linking Words
first
got their licenses but they are better informed of the realities and nuances of actual driving. Years of experience on the Linking Words
road
, similar to any job, will likely do more to develop their ability than standardized testing and certification. Use synonyms
Moreover
, the implementation of annual driving tests would necessitate immense bureaucratic expenses. Not only would there need to be a large department in charge but transport Linking Words
drivers
themselves would waste time each year getting recertified. In the aggregate, the effect on Use synonyms
road
safety would be negligible but the impact on efficiency would be significant.
In conclusion, Use synonyms
although
Linking Words
this
proposal is well-intentioned, its actual implementation would likely be inefficient and wasteful. Linking Words
Therefore
, more viable options should be explored.Linking Words
Submitted by melikaarttkd on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.