The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for the country's development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is believed that the administration should spend a large sum of money on

science

tutoring compared to other conventional lessons for the advancement of a

country

and a subsequent progression. I completely disagree with the statement because of two rock-solid reasons.

First

of all, a

country

’s

development

does not solely depend on the people who are from a scientific background. Even though they can contribute a lot to the infrastructural

development

, say, developing high-rise buildings, bridges, and so on but they can not do anything for the business aspects of a

country

which is

also

a key area for

development

. In

this

case, we need people from business schools,

for example

, BBA and MBA degrees holder. That’s why the government should give priority not only to the

science

lesson but

also

the business lesson in order to develop a progressive nation.

Secondly

, a

country

should

also

consider cultural advancement when it comes to the question of

development

.

That is

to say, an authority should invest more money in

subjects

that are related to the arts,

for instance

, dance, music, and many more in order to make a more culturally superior nation. For

this

reason, all cultural

subjects

should be samely treated like a

science

. In a nutshell, the government should equally treat both the

subjects

from the

science

and the art background when it comes to the question of investment. To sum up, it must be said that for the

development

of a

country

and to continue its progression the government should equally give priority to other

subjects

along with

science

. I guess without doing

such

, a

country

can not be advanced.