In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe that the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In recent years, the development of mass transit has never failed to draw public attention. Many hold a view that governments should spend budgets on the construction of cutting-edge transport

while

Linking Words

the counterargument is that the augmentation of current public vehicles is more important. Personally, I believe governments should make decisions based on specific circumstances. On the one hand, it is crucial to recognise that high-speed rail provides commuters with a fast and more convenient method of travelling. Nowadays, there is a great number of people who have to travel a vast distance between different urban areas to go to their workplaces, which is gruelling and time-consuming.

Hence

Linking Words

, the advent of metro systems would be a remedy

due to

Linking Words

their phenomenal speed.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, trains can carry thousands of passengers simultaneously thanks to their impressive capacity, which leads to a reduction in the number of private vehicles and alleviates traffic congestion

as well as

Linking Words

the emission of greenhouse gases. An example of

this

Linking Words

justification is the UK Underground, which has been globally renowned for its merits.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, objectors may argue that the expenditure on subways should have been spent on other social aspects and suggest authorities concentrate on improving the quality of current mass transit systems

instead

Linking Words

.

This

Linking Words

argument is somewhat true since the budget required for the construction of state-of-the-art methods of travelling would be extremely high and that may be at the expense of the money which should have been used to tackle other social issues.

Therefore

Linking Words

, traditional public vehicles will be invested in because of their affordability.

For instance

Linking Words

, the Cambodian government has long been focusing on the quality of their intercity coaches and national routes in place of erecting railway lines

due to

Linking Words

limited financial capacity. Taking all the mentioned facts into account,

it is clear that

Linking Words

novel travelling methods will be more suited for developed countries,

whereas

Linking Words

developing countries should be content with the current means of transport. In my opinion, the decision as to which method should be prioritised requires

further

Linking Words

consideration.