Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drinks that have been scientifically proven to be bad for people’s health. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that unhealthy cuisine and drinks that damage

people

's health should be banned. From my perspective, I partly agree with

this

statement and the following essay will discuss both pros and cons. There are some reasons to explain why shops are allowed to sell unhealthy

food

and drinks.

To begin

with, choosing which kind of diet is a basic human right, so the crowd can select any meal that they want to consume independently as long as they do not affect others.

Moreover

, it is unrealistic to prohibit all bad cuisine to be sold to the customers since there are considerable products that are chemically modified.

Therefore

, if all the chemical products are abandoned, it might lead to the consequence that

people

lack foodstuff.

On the other hand

,

although

it is not good to limit humans' rights, I believe that the government can control the amount of junk

food

and drinks consumed by the public. By decreasing the consumption of unhealthy diets, it might significantly enhance the health of the public.

For example

, if customers can only buy fast

food

4 times a month,

people

can keep fit and look for healthier products.

In addition

, partly inhibiting society to purchase junk

food

allows them to save money because of lowering the expenditure on unhealthy goods. In conclusion,

although

people

are allowed to select

food

whatever they want, I think that it is better to limit it to some degree because

population

Correct article usage

the population

show examples

become not only healthier but

also

richer.