Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drinks that have been scientifically proven to be bad for people’s health. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that unhealthy cuisine and drinks that damage
people
's health should be banned. From my perspective, I partly agree with this
statement and the following essay will discuss both pros and cons.
There are some reasons to explain why shops are allowed to sell unhealthy food
and drinks. To begin
with, choosing which kind of diet is a basic human right, so the crowd can select any meal that they want to consume independently as long as they do not affect others. Moreover
, it is unrealistic to prohibit all bad cuisine to be sold to the customers since there are considerable products that are chemically modified. Therefore
, if all the chemical products are abandoned, it might lead to the consequence that people
lack foodstuff.
On the other hand
, although
it is not good to limit humans' rights, I believe that the government can control the amount of junk food
and drinks consumed by the public. By decreasing the consumption of unhealthy diets, it might significantly enhance the health of the public. For example
, if customers can only buy fast food
4 times a month, people
can keep fit and look for healthier products. In addition
, partly inhibiting society to purchase junk food
allows them to save money because of lowering the expenditure on unhealthy goods.
In conclusion, although
people
are allowed to select food
whatever they want, I think that it is better to limit it to some degree because population
become not only healthier but Correct article usage
the population
also
richer.Submitted by wanchu.nien on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.