Many communities have to instantly do something with the consumption of fossil fuels in order to the number of fossil fuels which are consumed reduce. I disagree to some extent with   essay I will outline both sides of 
this
 statement, in Linking Words
this
,Linking Words
Add an article
 an 
 the 
this
 discussion.
On the one hand, communities should start solving Linking Words
this
 concern as fast as they can. The environment becomes less clear and fresh because of greenhouse gases. Linking Words
For instance
, during the quarantine in 2020, people could not use cars. So the regions without cars were improved in their ecology position by seven times. Linking Words
Moreover
, these harmful gases have a negative impact on human health as well. These methane and nitrous oxide impact extremely negative on the public's lungs. Due to Linking Words
this
 effect, folk's breath system does not work in a proper way.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, Linking Words
this
 problem can not be solved. Because of the reduction of the consumption of fossil fuels, the global economy will not be able to manage with 8 billion communities. Food packing, medical tablets, textiles, metals and more kinds of productions will be reduced in  amount,Linking Words
Linking Words
however
 it will be increased in price. Add a comma
,however
Consequently
, everyone turns into a poorer person or even will not afford a portion of food. Linking Words
Also
, by using fossil materials, populations develop themselves. In order to move to another planet which has better ecological systems and conditions for living, society would sacrifice something now Linking Words
such
 as surroundings and resources. 
In conclusion, there are  a lot of positive and negative sides,Linking Words
Linking Words
however
 I think that people should continue developing the world despite everything. After some time, it may lead to successful results and all human concerns will be reduced.Add a comma
,however