Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Medical studies have shown that smoking not only leads to well-being problems for the smoker but

also

for people close by.

As a result

of

this

, many believe that smoking should not be allowed in public areas.

Although

there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a prohibition is the most appropriate course of action. Opponents of

such

an injunction argue against it for several reasons.

Firstly

, they say that passive smokers make the choice to breathe in other people’s smoke by going to a zone where it is allowed. If they would prefer not to smog passively,

then

they do not need to visit points where smoking is permitted.

In addition

, they believe an embargo would possibly drive many bars and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore. They

also

argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. Smoking is not against the law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke where they wish.

However

, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a restriction.

First

and foremost, it has been proven that tobacco consists of carcinogenic compounds which cause serious harm to a person’s wellness, not only to the smoker. Anyone around them can develop cancers of the lungs, mouth and throat, and other sites in the body. It is simply not fair to impose

this

upon another person. It is

also

the case that people’s well-being is more important than businesses. In any case, pubs and restaurants could adapt to a ban by,

for example

, allowing smoking areas . In conclusion, it is clear that it should be made illegal to smoke in public neighbourhoods.

This

would improve the health of thousands of people, and

that is

most definitely a positive development.