Because of traffic and housing problems in the cities, the government encourages the business to move to the rural area. Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages?

It is said that displacing the business will dramatically alleviate the problems of both transportation and housing, which bother most urban areas.

However

,

this

solution can bring drawbacks in other aspects.

Initially

, a city's business, traffic and housing issues are all inextricably bound up by its citizens. If most of the corporations settle in the rural district,

then

the workforces employed by these companies have no choice but to increase the time spent on their long commute distances, which certainly will increase more burden on the traffic system.

Otherwise

, they need to move house again, which means that

this

group of people will take the main costs of

this

policy.

Moreover

, moving the pillar industry out of the city may bring negative effects. The loss of both high-salary employees and the main source of taxes is going to bring decreases

first

in citizen consumption and government revenues, which will indirectly have a discouraging impact on the vitality of whole urban development. Eventually, the process of modernization depends on the cluster effect, which will inevitably cause overcrowded problems.

In other words

, what needs to do is to provide a developed infrastructure in the

first

place and coordinate the development between cities,

instead

of attracting immigration without preparation or compulsively pushing a portion of trade away, which means corporations and residents must share the cost with the government. As I mentioned, it can be argued that the merits outweigh demerits in that it is not only complex but

also

full of risks to thoroughly settle down the traffic and housing problems just by moving the business.