Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. What solution is better?

Rapid urbanization has been a global phenomenon for a long, which has caused a serious concern over housing expansion. While some
cities
tackle
this
by constructing taller
buildings
, expanding the
area
for housing is what other
cities
adopt.
This
essay will discuss both of these perspectives on
city
development before giving my final verdict. Building housing areas with taller
buildings
will bring about certain benefits. The most obvious one is that
this
practice can solve the problem of land scarcity. As more and more
people
are flocking to
cities
, the land
area
required for housing is
also
ever-increasing. In
this
case, taller
buildings
emerge as an optimal remedy because they can accommodate a large number of
dwellers
yet take up a not too huge
area
.
This
can be exemplified by Manhattan in New York
city
where a multitude of tall apartments has been constructed to furnish
this
megacity with sufficient housing.
Secondly
,
people
living in tall
buildings
can have a more convenient life. It is because manifold
city
apartments incorporate various amenities ranging from supermarkets, and playgrounds to gyms, pools or banks in the same building. With these services being within walking distance,
city
dwellers
can enjoy different services without much difficulty.
Nevertheless
, building
houses
on a wider
area
of land
also
offers considerable merits.
To begin
with,
this
city
development direction correlates with a more comfortable life for the inhabitants. When growing in
this
way, the
cities
can provide
houses
with wider space, which means that
city
dwellers
can have more privacy and build their
houses
in accordance with their preferences.
For instance
, Los Angeles has been expanded in
this
way, bringing higher living standards to its
dwellers
since these
people
can relish better privacy and design their own housing spaces like having gardens, and building pools, making their lives much more cosy and satisfying.
Furthermore
, expanding housing areas serves as an antidote to overcrowded
city
centres. Should housing areas like tall apartments be concentrated just downtown, the
city
centre will be overwhelmed with
people
and other ensuing problems like traffic congestion, and overload of public services namely electricity, healthcare and education.
Therefore
, building
houses
in a wider
area
will disperse the population density, augmenting the living quality as well as divesting
city
centres of the overcrowding issues. In conclusion, both policies can prove their worth depending on the specific circumstances of different
cities
.
Hence
, it is imperative that
city
planners should be flexible in deciding on what solutions to put into practice for the sake of sustainable urban development.
Submitted by nhuminh031001 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • urban density
  • sustainability
  • public transportation
  • green spaces
  • community connections
  • overcrowding
  • economic implications
  • infrastructure impact
  • maintenance costs
  • carbon footprint
  • compact city
  • habitat destruction
  • greenhouse gas emissions
What to do next:
Look at other essays: