Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. What solution is better?
Rapid urbanization has been a global phenomenon for a long, which has caused a serious concern over housing expansion. While some
cities
tackle this
by constructing taller buildings
, expanding the area
for housing is what other cities
adopt. This
essay will discuss both of these perspectives on city
development before giving my final verdict.
Building housing areas with taller buildings
will bring about certain benefits. The most obvious one is that this
practice can solve the problem of land scarcity. As more and more people
are flocking to cities
, the land area
required for housing is also
ever-increasing. In this
case, taller buildings
emerge as an optimal remedy because they can accommodate a large number of dwellers
yet take up a not too huge area
. This
can be exemplified by Manhattan in New York city
where a multitude of tall apartments has been constructed to furnish this
megacity with sufficient housing. Secondly
, people
living in tall buildings
can have a more convenient life. It is because manifold city
apartments incorporate various amenities ranging from supermarkets, and playgrounds to gyms, pools or banks in the same building. With these services being within walking distance, city
dwellers
can enjoy different services without much difficulty.
Nevertheless
, building houses
on a wider area
of land also
offers considerable merits. To begin
with, this
city
development direction correlates with a more comfortable life for the inhabitants. When growing in this
way, the cities
can provide houses
with wider space, which means that city
dwellers
can have more privacy and build their houses
in accordance with their preferences. For instance
, Los Angeles has been expanded in this
way, bringing higher living standards to its dwellers
since these people
can relish better privacy and design their own housing spaces like having gardens, and building pools, making their lives much more cosy and satisfying. Furthermore
, expanding housing areas serves as an antidote to overcrowded city
centres. Should housing areas like tall apartments be concentrated just downtown, the city
centre will be overwhelmed with people
and other ensuing problems like traffic congestion, and overload of public services namely electricity, healthcare and education. Therefore
, building houses
in a wider area
will disperse the population density, augmenting the living quality as well as divesting city
centres of the overcrowding issues.
In conclusion, both policies can prove their worth depending on the specific circumstances of different cities
. Hence
, it is imperative that city
planners should be flexible in deciding on what solutions to put into practice for the sake of sustainable urban development.Submitted by nhuminh031001 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?
