Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. Do you agree or disagree?

The government outlays a certain amount of money on

art

in different parts of the world. They invest in organizations and education and support them in order to progress. Some people advocate the opinion that these wage funds should be allocated to public service infrastructures. It disagrees that

art

could be neglected in society. Considering the mental health of public residents of a nation as well as entrepreneurship of the people will explain

this

.

Firstly

, the absence of

art

and beauty leads to a mental breakdown in humans.

For instance

, recent studies have shown that listening to music, regardless of what type of sound it conveys, elevates the mental state of individuals. Sadly, these mental issues would appear

as a result

of neglect of

this

vital aspect of life.

Therefore

,

art

can not be eradicated as the potential outcomes could be devastating.

Secondly

, the existence of

art

can create careers resulting in stronger economics for a nation if they are organized and properly invested in by the government.

For example

, outlaying in artistic fields in France has made it one of the most popular countries in arts-related subjects; gravitating a vast number of tourists and travellers annually.

Thus

it is quite beneficial to support them. In a nutshell, arts and artists are important elements in society to elevate individuals mentally and spiritually

in addition

to bringing economical profit to both the government and people with

art

-related occupations.

Therefore

, it is unwise to undervalue

this

and allocate the equivalent money elsewhere. After considering the possible impacts it can be proven that

art

should exist.