Computers today can quickly and accurately translate languages; therefore, it is a waste of time to learn a foreign language. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Technology

is so advanced that we are able to translate any

language

. It is believed by some people that learning a new

language

is no longer required unlike before. Personally, I completely disagree with the statement as it is essential to know a

language

to understand the local culture and

also

to communicate with emotions. The most prominent reason for believing that communicating in person by learning a non-native dialect is better than depending on computers for translation is due to the fact that conservation would only be effective if it is spoken naturally with emotions. Indeed, for conservation to be interactive, it requires to be expressed not only with words

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

but

also

with emotions. In

this

case, the translated conversation will add little to make it entertaining, and

also

lacks a personal touch. Having had translated communication, people would not be able to develop personal relationships in the long run. The more we rely on

technology

for communication, the weaker would be our social relationships. Another significant factor in learning an overseas

language

is the fact that a foreign country's culture can not be learned without knowing their tongue. There are cultural diversities between nations, even though we live in a global village because of advanced

technology

. So it is crucial to learn the culture and tradition of a new place, in order to settle there which can be done only by learning their native dialect. If

technology

is used in

such

a scenario, it is of no value. In conclusion, in my opinion, people need to continue learning new languages,

although

computers can assist in translating mainly for developing personal bonding, and for adapting to new cultures.