Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is believed that formerly incarcerated people are the most appropriate ones to communicate with youngsters to avoid future delinquencies. I strongly agree with the idea, for it is a direct driving force to become morally better. Having past prisoners communicate with
teenagers
decreases the juvenile crime rate.
Teenagers
who have an opportunity to listen to the shares, especially those who hold rebellious thoughts or have been behind bars, are more likely to feel guilty and scared of what may happen to them like the ones sharing with them about the dangers. To illustrate the effectiveness of
such
doing, talk shows having those with past criminal records are organised annually by some schools in Ho Chi Minh City. Over the years, it has explicitly led to a significant decrease in
a
Correct article usage
the
show examples
tide of young offending, and
a
Remove the article
apply
show examples
growth of ethical students. Yet, some readers may challenge the practice with the view that having
experts
like psychiatrists present as ‘life coaches’ is more appropriate than former prisoners. people believe the
experts
can provide relevant expertise that prevents impulsive actions from
teenagers
and are safer to communicate.
However
, the knowledge imparted may not be a strong enough impact, for the
experts
cannot express prisoners’ feelings of suffering and remorse vividly, the main factors making
teenagers
stay away from delinquencies more effectively.  As long as the conversation is under strict supervision, there will be little chance for negative dissemination. In conclusion, it is true that
experts
can offer moral insight to adolescents to form their mindsets. Still, inviting those who have been in prison to talk with
teenagers
is a more thorough method, and should be done under strict supervision to avoid offences and negative dissemination.
Submitted by lethaovy on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • prisoners
  • rehabilitation
  • recidivism
  • consequences
  • insights
  • deterrent
  • guidance
  • support
  • role models
  • positive change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: