The best way to understand other cultures is to work for a multinational organization. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In
this
contemporary epoch, whilst opponents hold the view that working in multinational companies improves communication skills with other nationalities, proponents have a diverse view.However
, I am a staunch believer that it has a good impact on individuals and society as well. My contention will be further
explained.
To embark on, dealing with people from other countries improves the way of thinking. To illustrate, when employees meet their foreign colleagues, they learn beneficial things from their cultures and start to accept different ways of thinking. For example
, in Egypt, when Egyptians engaged a multinational company, they turned to be more restricted and estimated the value of work. Hence
, what can be said is that not only do employees in Japanese companies have lucrative jobs, but also
they learn variant ethics from them.
Nevertheless
, Syrian and Italian restaurants in many countries over
the world affect the nature of eating in them. Rephrase
all over
In other words
, if some chefs work at these restaurants, they learn a plethora of various types of food. A prime example of that is
pizza, which spread in many cities because many cooks learnt
how to prepare it when they work at Italian restaurants. Correct your spelling
learn
In addition
, many people feel satisfied when they eat it. Therefore
, working in such
shops bring
to the local kitchen many delicious plates.
In conclusion, Correct subject-verb agreement
brings
after
this
essay has manifested the points mentioned above, it can be reiterated that multinational factory recruitment plays an effective role in mixing different cultural thoughts. However
, I am convinced that it is hard to underestimate the influence of participating in such
organizations.Submitted by amer.ebtsam on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
The essay presents a limited response to the task and lacks relevant examples to support the ideas. More specific and relevant examples are needed to fully address the prompt and support the argument effectively.
coherence and cohesion
The logical structure of the essay is somewhat clear, but the development of ideas is not well-organized. The essay lacks a clear progression of ideas, and the examples provided do not effectively support the main points.
lexical resource
The essay demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary and uses a variety of words and phrases. However, there are instances of inaccurate word choice and awkward phrasing that hinder the fluency and precision of expression.
grammatical range
The essay shows a limited control of grammar and sentence structure. There are several errors in sentence construction, verb tense usage, and agreement that impact the clarity and coherence of the essay.