governments in many countries are replacing old buildings such as art galleries and town halls with new ones. is this positive or a negative development.

Nowadays, many authorities and governments are converting old

buildings

such

as town halls, art galleries, and museums into new ones.

Although

this

approach is like a double-edged sword and these changes may be good and effective

but

Remove the conjunction

apply

show examples

I believe the drawbacks of these changes overcome the benefits.

To begin

with, many of these old

buildings

and historical

places

are rooted in the ancestors and history of a nation and replacing them with new structures can completely destroy these roots and the connection. These sorts of

buildings

somehow are the legacy of countries and

besides

that, they are portraying the history of old generations.

Hence

, it is a social duty to prevent these changes and teach future generations about the importance of these historical structures.

For example

, in ,Turkey there are several historical

places

where you can see that the people and government try hard to keep these

buildings

secure and every few years they rebuild them

instead

of replacing them.

Furthermore

, these historical

places

are tourist attractions and many people from all around the world come to see

places

like art galleries, museums, and town halls

also

have a significant role in the local economy.

Therefore

, new

buildings

not only destroy the important aspects of the city but

also

ruin the tourism business. In a nutshell, there is

not any

Rephrase

no

show examples

doubt that ancient

places

are so important for countries in many ways.

However

, new

buildings

can improve the face of the cities with new designs but it is vital that

along with

upgrading cities we should

also

keep the ancient

places

that have a connection with our culture.