People who decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it are more likely to have a satisfying working life than those who change jobs frequently. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that people with a consistent profession at first and still in its path are more pleased in life than those who repeatedly change jobs. I strongly agree with

this

statement because it is more appealing to have a steady salary;

thus

, the person can feel more secure in his financial

term

Fix the agreement mistake

terms

show examples

. With regard to the decision on a career for the first time, it will give you a strong foundation for fulfilling daily needs.

Furthermore

, a stable wage allows one to manage the budget to stay afloat and save more.

Consequently

, your life will remain more secure and diminish stress regarding lack of funding.

For instance

, it is easier for an employee to plan financially when the primary compensation is fixed and allows them to allocate some savings funds consistently.

Moreover

, the potential rise in salary makes the professional more financially secure.

Thus

,

this

positive feeling will support workplace performance and open the chance for promotion and higher earnings.

In addition

, it can give a guarantee in retirement budget planning.

Hence

, financial security will result in a satisfying life. It can be seen in my parent's experience; they saved at least 10% of their monthly salary when they worked. By the time they are retired, they can stay afloat from their saving and avoid their children being sandwich generation.

To sum up

,

although

changing jobs frequently for some people is more challenging and satisfies them, I am confident that sticking to one career will fulfil you more because of a steady pay guarantee and secure your finances.