Some people think that governments should only focus their spending on public services, and they claim that spending on arts is a waste of money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It has been disputable that the authority should only spend

money

building public facilities,

in contrast

, expenditure on arts is a waste of

money

. I agree with

this

statement. In the following paragraphs, I am going to discuss my viewpoints.

To begin

with, a successful government need to put effort into people-oriented amenities, social welfare, and improvement of life quality.

As a result

, expenditure on

art

is not important relatively. For the majority of people, convenient public transportation, pension payment for the elderly and subsidies for technology improvement are more essential and helpful to their daily lives.

In addition

, there are a lot of issues we are facing now. The government has to give priority to the most compelling issues that may affect people’s survival.

For instance

, in a poor country like Congo, civil wars and conflicts occur every day. The nation lacks the necessities like water, clothing and public health systems. It is so urgent to empower civilians to make their lives better and changed which

art

can not do.

Moreover

,

art

activities usually require a lot of funds which is affordable only for rich people.

For example

, the courses in dancing, music, painting or the tickets to opera, and concerts cost a massive amount of

money

that only wealthy civilians have the ability to enjoy them. The investment in

art

does not benefit

all

Correct determiner usage

apply

show examples

the population in the county. In conclusion, spending on

art

does not benefit people’s everyday lives like social welfare and public facilities do.

Also

, not all people can get access to or enjoy

art

because it is very expensive.

As a result

, the nation is supposed to spend

money

on public services

instead

of

art

.