Some people argue that it is not wise for an industry to replace its experienced but old workers with new and young yet inexperienced individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One of the controversial questions in some industries nowadays is that should we replace old experienced
workers
with young and inexperienced individuals. Particularly, it is Correct your spelling
not
noto
wise to do that, isn't it? In my opinion, I strongly agree and encourage these industries to employ more new young employees rather than Correct your spelling
not
Correct article usage
the elderly
elderly
.
Correct pronoun usage
oneselderly
Firstly
, we can not deny the indisuptable
fact that young Correct your spelling
indisputable
workers
complete required tasks more effectively and productively than old ones in Add an article
the specific
specific
allowed time. It Change the adjective
specifically
completely
because the young Add a missing verb
is completely
at
Change preposition
in
the
present generation have Correct article usage
apply
active
and creative Add an article
an active
the active
character
which is really useful for them in Fix the agreement mistake
characters
competitive
company. Absolutely, all employers want to accept Add an article
a competitive
workers
who have these standard
Fix the agreement mistake
standards
such
as Apple, Samsung, etc. In addition
, every
new young Correct determiner usage
apply
workers
or even graduates Change to a singular noun
worker
also
need more opportunities to work
so that they can gain more experience in their life.
Secondly
, old workers
were not able to spend their entire life to work
for their company because of the
health problems. Correct article usage
apply
For example
, because of the
bad health or even getting older, they have to take a break Correct article usage
apply
approximately
one to two hours per shift, while the young could Change preposition
of approximately
work
five to six hours straight without any break. Besides
, government's
policy nowadays has permitted old Correct article usage
the government's
workers
whom
Correct pronoun usage
who
over
Add a missing verb
are over
fifty five
years old to retire, and after they have started to retire, they would get their own pension. For that two reasons, the old should stop their Add a hyphen
fifty-five
work
if they could not do anymore
.
In conclusion, I think because of the industries and companies' Correct pronoun usage
it anymore
policy
, they should replace the old with new young effective Fix the agreement mistake
policies
workers
.Submitted by shin.le1988 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.