In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe that money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

There are a few regions where individuals feel that it is important to spend a large amount of cash to build new railway machinery to improve train speed so they can travel faster between cities. While there are other people that have their opinion that these funds could be better spent on making the existing public transportation better. In
this
essay, I will write about why purchasing newer train lines could save
time
and how they could save more capital by upgrading
Correct article usage
the line
show examples
line
Fix the agreement mistake
lines
show examples
they already possess as well as include my own opinion.
First
of all, if more cities were to invest wealth into their railways it would make the distance shorter for their travellers since the
trains
would be able to drive faster and save
time
. By upgrading the rail lines, they would be able to
transport
quicker
trains
which would lead to customers being transported in less
time
frame.
For instance
, Sweden and Norway decided to upgrade their train railways and since
then
it has improved their
time
by 85% when it came to travel distance.
However
, these countries will better save their limited budget if they improve their existing public
transport
. Maintaining and upgrading
trains
that already exist would improve what they already own, and they would spend less
money
.
For example
, Australia has chosen to upgrade their existing
transport
and the outcome was that the
money
spent was 50% less than what Sweden and Norway spent on their public
transport
. In conclusion, if countries spent more funds to improve rail lines it would save
time
since faster
trains
would be able to be used. At the same ,
time
countries would save more
money
by improving their existing ones. I believe that it is better to spend
money
on upgrading
trains
that are already in use since it will cut costs which could be used elsewhere.
Submitted by Andrea Barreto on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this siteโ€™s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: