Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?

In the present age, much debate has sparked whether producing as much as possible is worth pursuing

for

Remove the preposition

apply

show examples

every

country

. In my personal

opinion

Add a comma

,opinion

show examples

it is of much importance,

however

,

production

should not be limitless. In

this

essay, I shall discuss both sides and give my findings in a conclusion.

To begin

, rapid

production

enriches the living standard of the

country

by boosting its economy. Maximizing exports and

production

of a given

country

allows it to massively benefit economically. Large exports

also

mean

less

Change the quantifier

fewer

show examples

imports, empowering the local economy to thrive without having to deal with foreign competition.

This

, as well as a larger GDP, lift up the HDI and, in turn, improve the livelihood of most if not all citizens.

However

, unlimited

production

results in industrial pollution, harming people and the environment. If a

country

solely focuses on industrial manufacturing without considering the consequences of these actions,

then

the environment of the

country

will suffer.

This

has negative effects on not only nature

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

but

also

people,

for

example

Add the comma(s)

,example

show examples

the infamous London Smog, killing 22 thousand in 1952.

This

isn't the only instance, but just a real reminder that

production

needs to be balanced with ecological action. To conclude I can on balance assert that manufacturing brings many benefits to a

country

,

Correct word choice

but

show examples

however

Add a comma

,however

show examples

should not be

practiced

Change the spelling

practised

show examples

carelessly.