All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people are of the view that automobiles that use non-renewable energy should be prohibited and strictly banned from operating,

instead

, an electric car should be used. I concur with

this

viewpoint because

firstly

, environmental

pollution

will be reduced and,

secondly

, climate change will be curbed.

To begin

with, banning the usage of fossil

fuels

will help minimize environmental

pollution

. These

fuels

emit tonnes of carbon dioxide leading to air

pollution

, which is extremely harmful to humans. Some of these oil and gas are drilled in urban areas, destroying human habitats. Land and water

pollution

also

occur

as a result

of drilling these

fuels

.

For example

, lots of vehicles contemporarily, use petrol and diesel as the main source of power, and

hence

, the establishment of numerous non-renewable energy companies

leading

Wrong verb form

led

show examples

to an increase in natural destruction.

Furthermore

, banning machines that use

this

source of power will help reduce climate change. Global warming is almost entirely caused by these fossil

fuels

. Carbon dioxide produced by burning these

fuels

are

Change the verb form

is

show examples

trapped in the air leading to an increase in the

Correct your spelling

greenhouse

show examples

green house

Correct your spelling

greenhouse

show examples

effects

Fix the agreement mistake

effect

show examples

.

For instance

, a country like Ghana, in the western part of Africa, is supposed to be experiencing a harmattan season currently,

instead

, it is under heavy rainfall each day. In conclusion, people who opine that all cars that utilise fossil

fuels

should be forbidden are not far from right, and I totally support

this

idea because doing so will help mitigate environmental

pollution

, as well as

reducing

Wrong verb form

reduce

show examples

global warming.