Fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) are the main source in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative source of energy (wind and solar energy) are encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development?

It is true that most countries can'

t

go out without fossil

fuels

such

as coal, oil, or natural gas while using other substitutes

such

as wind or sun is being supported in some countries. There could be several reasons for

this

, and I believe it is a positive trend. Since the former ages, Human beings massively depended on fossil

fuels

to produce its need of

energy

. There were many reasons behind that, as it didn'

t

need much effort, it was highly productive, and it was easily transportable.

Besides

they didn'

t

expect that it will vanish or decrease from the earth in one day. With continuous and full dependence on fossil ,

fuels

people began to discover its disadvantages, starting from the pollution it causes to the high costs on the users and the main issue that it can'

t

be renewable so people became aware that it has a limit

then

it will no longer be available.

Consequently

, The governments began to motivate people and industries to replace fossil

fuels

with natural

sources

of

energy

such

as wind or solar

energy

. They found that it's a more clean source with lower or nearly zero exhaustion to the environment.

In addition

to its always availability, it's safe and can be easily renewed. Developing and poor countries aimed their forces to find more methods relying more on those

sources

of

energy

. In conclusion, There world needs a variety of

energy

sources

and the more there are alternative

sources

the easier our lives will be especially if they are not vanishing

sources

.