Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development?

Every nation have its own priority when it comes to an

energy

source

, some prefer non-renewable

source

while another emphasises renewable origin

such

as wind and solar which I reckon is a positive development. In my essay, I would discuss the benefits of using alternative origin over fossil fuels.

First

of all, wind and solar

energy

are permanent sources that will never get depletion, unlike fossil fuels which take millions of years to form. A nation no longer has to worry about buying these from other countries as they can make their own.

For example

, the country like China, the USA, UK and Germany generates significant megawatts of

energy

yearly.

Secondly

, non-conventional

energy

origin is a super clean

source

for the ecosystem. As it doesn't produce any carbon dioxide emissions like coal, oil and natural gases.

For instance

, China, which is producing higher emission gases, now has declared to bring that ratio to zero by 2050 by using alternative

energy

sources.

Therefore

, wind and solar

energy

are the purest forms which do not cause any weather-related harm to

living

Change the verb form

live

show examples

beings. In conclusion, an alternative

source

of

energy

is the positive development which retains life long and is safer for living creatures rather than fossil fuels which negatively affect the eco-system.