Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some
people
consider that the best
people
to educate the younger generation about how dangerous committing a
crime
could be are those ex-offenders. I partly agree with
this
idea. I understand that these ex-prisoners have educational meaning. They can tell the youth how they are involved in
crime
, what
prison
life is like, and how their lives have been changed after committing a
crime
. It seems that they are more convincing to younger
people
because ex-prisoners have real experience with life in
prison
. The vivid and perhaps shocking nature of these stories may have some deterrent impact.
However
, I doubt that these reformed prisoners may intentionally pass on the message that the result of making a
crime
is not as terrible as what
people
usually think of, because criminals have enough chances to alter themselves in
prison
. And these reformed criminals are right
the
Change preposition
in the
show examples
reference to
this
.
This
situation may cause an opposite effect to deterrent.
Therefore
, I think there are better alternatives to educating young
people
about the danger of committing a
crime
. Police officers can be more suitable to talk about
this
with teenagers. They can speak more about the boring
prison
life and the long-term impact of
prison
periods on criminals.
For example
, many ex-prisoners have been caught in trouble when finding decent jobs.
This
information can pose a stronger deterrent to students. To sum up, I believe that
people
like police officers can have expected effects when educating younger adults on
crime
things, while the citizens who used to be in
prison
can have some effects on
this
topic to some extent.
Submitted by 535911488 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • prisoners
  • rehabilitation
  • recidivism
  • consequences
  • insights
  • deterrent
  • guidance
  • support
  • role models
  • positive change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: