In same cities, governments have tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they impose tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive or negative?

The problem of transportation congestion in metropolitan was always debatable and now has become more controversial. Some masses believe that authorities should charge fines and take action to reduce the movement while others reject
this
notion by saying there are various ways to control vehicle rush. In my opinion, the former preposition appears more rational and in
this
essay, I will consider
this
as a positive development with valid reasons behind
this
notion and
thus
leading to a logical conclusion.
To begin
with, there are myriad of reasons which will
further
elaborate the trend but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that reduction of vehicles on the road will minimise the pollutant particles from the environment and pollution free air.
In other words
, ministry efforts
also
help to reduce the polluted air produced by vehicles on road. Another pivotal aspect of
this
trend is that heavy motor congestion makes disturbing noise which leads to noise pollution. if the government made some rules
then
this
will
also
make the city noise free.
Moreover
, the increasing number of automobiles on the road is the reason of accidents upward ratio. which is dangerous for humankind, fewer numbers of wheels will compress
this
hazardous situation.
Furthermore
, due to high transportation on the way to the designation, many folk face the problem with commuting distance from home to the office and due to ,that they migrate to their workstation areas. union actions will
also
help many working crowds to minimise their travel time.
Hence
that is
why many families are in the favour of
this
trend. To recapitulate, according to the aforementioned above one can reach the conclusion that the benefits of taking action against the increment in transit jams and imposing fines on the community are to reduce them. with strict ,rule law can solve any problem in one go.
Submitted by sharma.divya.nid on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • imposition
  • rush-hour tax
  • road congestion
  • sustainable urban environment
  • public transportation infrastructure
  • disproportionately affect
  • flexible work hours
  • alternative transportation options
  • displacing the traffic problem
  • effectiveness
  • psychological
  • societal impacts
  • cultural attitudes
  • commuting
  • remote work
  • staggered work hours
  • quality of life
  • commute times
  • work-life balance
  • unintended consequences
  • isolation
  • collaboration
  • team dynamics
  • urban mobility
What to do next:
Look at other essays: