Governments are sometimes careless with public money. Renovations of old buildings are examples where exceeding sums are spent, whereas more investments are necessary for new infrastructures, like housing and transportation. For that matter, I believe that authorities ought to distribute resources cautiously, prioritizing building new houses and developing roads.
Renovating new buildings is probably a good step toward mitigating gentrification.
For example
, adapting business facilities no longer used due to increased remote working could help alleviate the housing crisis in metropolitan areas. Linking Words
This
way, rental units would be offered to low-income citizens, which would Linking Words
also
reduce commuting time, and Linking Words
hence
decrease the deterioration of Linking Words
city
streets caused by high-volume traffic. Use synonyms
Moreover
, some facilities could Linking Words
also
be adapted to house homeless people who need specialized mental health care.
Linking Words
However
, funds are limited, Linking Words
thus
a diligent use of public money is imperative. Linking Words
For instance
, an enormous amount should not be spent on renovations. More funds are needed for suburbs and small towns where urbanization is still ongoing. Linking Words
This
could have a great impact on society since more people would have access to fair prices for buying their homes. Linking Words
Furthermore
, if improved roads were developed, there would be easier integration between Linking Words
city
centres and surrounding towns. Use synonyms
Finally
, desmotropolization is a sound solution to crowding, decreasing the risks of a new pandemic.
In conclusion, I agree that renovations of old buildings are a way of dealing with gentrification in Linking Words
city
centres, but there is too much money invested in it, while more should be spent on housing outside Use synonyms
city
boundaries and with roads to integrate all areas.Use synonyms
walter.sena