Parents should encourage their children to spend less time on study and more time on doing physical activities. Do you agree or disagree?

In recent years, parents would let their kids take less

time

studying than helping them take physical actions. And an increasing number of fathers and mothers are willing to advertise and do so. According to

this

reality, I would disagree with

this

point and verify it with related ideas as below. On the one hand, the schools encourage

students

to enrich their exercises and promote their body's strength can benefit young

students

.

For instance

, those movements may motivate their inspiration positively.

Although

I think the approach is practical, I would definitely disagree that children should spend more

time

on that. As common sense, pupils' study is hard to achieve each term, and it is

also

impossible to extract the original limited

time

for more physical exercises.

Secondly

,

students

have to face the challenges of mid-term and final-term exams,

apparently

Add a comma

,apparently

show examples

it would not be possible to condense their valuable age to take more

activities

rather than more

time

studying.

On the other hand

, practising

activities

could not take the place of the use of learning knowledge.

For example

, common subjects focus on physics, chemistry, mathematics, and others, but physical life just relates to actual practice

instead

of abstract conceptual theories and real paper exams.

Thus

, young

students

cannot pass the exams well and gain a certificate of satisfactory graduation. In the future,

likewise

, they are not going to obtain admission to university smoothly. In conclusion, I firmly believe that children ought to take more pace on studying rather than doing physical

activities

. As a supplementary method, pupils are capable of doing suitable physical

activities

to make them stronger and healthier.

Therefore

, these kinds of pupils can fit the purpose of the nation's development eventually.