some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsary parts of a high school programmes,for example working for a charity ,improving the neighbour hood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree ?

Although

, many people believe that some unpaid community learning is mandatory in school subjects many colleges give

this

knowledge as a program. I support

this

statement to a large extent for some reasons.My position is argued

further

with an explanation. Out of all the reasons, the foremost education is a fundamental right of every child,

meanwhile

Add a comma

,meanwhile

show examples

if schools and colleges give some community free service

such

as charity and make some relation to students was good for society.

This

is due to some child don't know their neighbour and their culture

however

children don't share their things with others. To add to

this

all free services are learned from high education, they meet every people and understand them more than they share everything with everyone. So I think

this

service is more important in student time.

Additionally

, everyone knows the earth suffers from many climate changes due to urbanization.

This

is because everyone transfers to the city area and cut the trees if people are well educated they cut one tree at a time they plant a

second

tree on another side.

Moreover

every person's obesity increase because of lack of physical activity, for

this

easy one is single two hours sports is compulsory in class.

However

, I would not overlook the other side too,

To begin

with, a child has learned lots of subjects in school and college and at that time some extra work is given to them, they don't do that work happily.

Also

, they have lots of burdens.

Thus

, to conclude the discussion, it can be

finally

said that

although

unpaid community services are compulsory for a student that things are more important in society rather than other subjects. I believe

this

thing is rational.