The governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Over the

last

few decades,

countries

with strong economies are gaining more as compared to

countries

which are poor. Some people state that the effluent

countries

should provide foreign aid to the nations in need. My inclination is,

this

approach can facilitate access to

life

support

and help thrive weak economies. To

support

my opinion, the communities in poorer communities are dealing with impoverished health facilities, which results in diseases and early deaths. If supreme powers help them establish clinics and disperse basic

life

facilities like medicines and clean water, they might obtain healthy lives.

For instance

, research shows that people In Syria and Iraq had long-

life

diseases by dirty waters and death rates spiked but after receiving

support

from foreign lands, their rates of survival were astonishing.

Hence

, if utilized properly, the money can eradicate the illness.

Moreover

, talking about the education system, people hardly have access to learning in less developed

countries

. If only they can get help to educate their population, their economy might boost with inner

support

.

For Example

, In Afghanistan, women were deprived of literacy but following the backing of foreign aid from America and other

countries

, they gained schooling to

support

their country. Education helped them to cut the vicious cycle of poverty with the help of developing

countries

. To conclude, I illustrate that

support

from the supreme world can spark growth and sustain

life

in a smaller world. By getting access to health, education and infrastructure, poorer nations can

also

develop their economy to lead

Add an article

a

show examples

healthy

life

.