"Prevention is better than cure."' Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Most governments are using a massive amount of money on

health

section: giving free treatment to cancer patients or free

health

services for retirees

instead

of investing in research that can tell us the causes of those deadly conditions. I agree that the government should use a large proportion of the

health

budget on preventative measures and

health

knowledge. Treatment is essential, but it is better not to suffer from the

disease

because there are many incurable diseases,

such

as cancer and advanced heart diseases.

Firstly

, when you suffer from an illness, you might undergo symptoms ranging from mild to severe depending on the intensity of the

disease

.

For instance

, a gentle cancer patient might experience losing hair, while a severe patient hurts severely due to the illness.

In addition

, it

also

costs tons of money to cure a

disease

or relieve pain. That's why it is best when you can be from suffering the disorders as much as possible. Another reason

health

education is beneficial for the government to invest in is that most people don't know how to prevent diseases. To point out one thing, the Covid pandemic was a daunting problem for the world before we learned how to avoid it. Regardless of any illnesses, if we have a clue to avert those, we don't have to suffer and cure them anymore. For the above aspects, preventing

disease

before it happens is the best way to sustain ourselves. The government is

also

responsible for supporting research and

health

education which can help reduce the

disease

rate. It will always be the ultimate solution to go to the roots of the causes rather than going the other way around.