The best curriculum is not one based on a static body of language, but one which students to cope up with change, to what extent do you agree or disagree

There are always a lot of discussions about what kind of teaching method is better. Whether students should learn some rigid knowledge or should they gain the ability to face different situations. Society has different opinions as opposed to each other, and I agree with the former idea. There are several reasons why I think a static language system is more important than knowing how to tackle changes.
First
, as we all know, simple and static situations are easier than one which has lots of complex conditions, so it is more manageable for beginners to learn about them.
For example
, we always learn some basic theories
first
,
then
try to practice them in the real world.
Second
, every subject has its own logic system behind it. Only when people get the fundamental information can they handle the upper-grade problems based on it.
Finally
, we will forget most of the things that we learned during the course, but the thinking styles and methods will remain. And these kinds of tools can really help us to cope with difficulties,
instead
of some specific skills which we learned to face changes. There are some other ideas about why we should pay more attention to the fundamental body. On the one hand, even though in practice, things will change, they will switch around the central concepts.
As a result
, the best tool is our thinking method, which adds the differences to the basic model we learned before.
On the other hand
, the changes are unpredictable. There is no model or function against them. But the static systems of acknowledgement are always moving forward. The more people learn about the essential concepts, the better performance they will have. So the most important tools are based on theoretical languages. In conclusion, I agree that the best curriculum is based on the static body of language.
Submitted by jiang.xintong.1997.10.23 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: