All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that electric

cars

are highly recommended to replace the use of fossil fuels

cars

entirely.

This

essay agrees that electric

cars

can reduce

air

pollution

and are cost-effective. The replacement of electric

cars

has significantly shown a prominent result which affects

air

pollution

reduction.

That is

to say, unlike patrol

cars

, which produce greenhouse houses that contribute the climate change, electric

cars

produce near zero

air

pollution

because fossil fuels produce less carbon dioxide.

As a result

, it reduces the effects of petrol that lead to global warming.

For example

, Australia, which has constantly been promoting the utilization of non-combustion engines since 2010, has reported a decrease in the

air

pollution

index of around 13% over ten years.

In addition

, less carbon dioxide

also

means uplifting the

air

quality, which positively affects body health. As a consequence, the mortality rate decreases significantly.

Further

, using electricity as the main source of electric

cars

is cost-effective because most of the

power

supplies come from natural resources,

such

as wind, solar, and hydropower.

This

is because natural resources are unlimited while fossil fuel has greatly reduced. The limited availabilities increase the price of petrol

power

.

In contrast

,

power

supplies of natural energy are more affordable.

For instance

, the

cars

produced by Mitsubishi use energy for solar energy, which is much less expensive than fossil fuel prices.

In other words

, people spend less money buying

power

supplies for their

cars

. In conclusion,

this

essay acknowledges that

cars

powered by electricity should be used to replace the burned fossil petrol because of the effectiveness of lessening

air

pollution

and being more affordable than the fuels.