Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree and disagree with this statement?

Nowadays, there is a debate associated with
governments
Correct word choice
whether governments
show examples
should invest significant money in
railways
rather than roads. In my opinion, developing
railways
can help to resolve traffic issues, and it can lead to individuals moving to rural areas without any concern about their commute. It is my view that governments should invest more money in
railways
due to
encourage people to commute by
train
and it can lead to reducing the amount of traffics.
Moreover
, it can encourage the population to live in
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
suburban area and commute by
train
.
Furthermore
, using a
train
can decreases the proportion of time commuters spend to reach their destination.
In addition
, fares can be a great source of revenue for the government, so they should invest in the infrastructure of
trains
and public transport.
Also
,
trains
are an environmentally friendly form of transport, so
trains
can help protect the environment.
In contrast
, a group of people claim that if governments spend more money to develop roads, It can lead to reducing the number of accidents that happen because of bad road conditions.
Moreover
, It can decline the amount of traffic in the city.
However
, I do not find the argument convincing as developing roads condition can not reduce traffic size;
instead
, it causes more people to use privet cars, and it can lead to an increase in the number of accidents. In conclusion, I agree entirely that city planners should invest in
railways
to improve
train
systems to promote the use of alternative forms of transportation,
such
as
trains
, buses, and aeroplanes, to protect the environment and reduce congestion in cities.
Submitted by melika.verdi on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • sustainability
  • environmental footprint
  • efficiency
  • pollution
  • cost-effectiveness
  • economic development
  • accessibility
  • public transportation
  • congestion
  • air pollution
  • initial investment
  • maintenance
  • upgrades
  • rural
  • urban
  • last-mile connectivity
What to do next:
Look at other essays: