Advertisement of snacks and toys have a great impact on children and their parents. So, the advertisements to children should be banned. Do you agree or disagree?

These days, many people discuss whether publicity about some products

to

Change preposition

apply

show examples

toodles should be allowed by the government. I tend to believe that marketing campaigns

of

Change preposition

for

show examples

toys and snacks should be prevented for the following reasons. Three main factors support the idea of freeing children from advertisements. First of all, we need to take into consideration that if advertisements made to

this

group would be prohibited, would be easier to parents to offer healthy food and challenge them to explore their imagination

creating

Change preposition

by creating

show examples

their own toys.

Besides

, the anxiety of children would be reduced as there

is

Change the verb form

are

show examples

fewer materials designed to catch their attention in order to sell products.

That is

to say, their innocence would not be explored by companies to increase sales because it is an unfair game. A third reason for my belief is that banning commercials made to children public would preserve childhood from consumerism until they have the maturity to make their own decisions. I admit that without

advertisement

Fix the agreement mistake

advertisements

show examples

, many companies which sell snacks and toys would not be known by their consumers. Despite that, the authorities have to consider that

this

public is sensible and can be harmed by

this

kind of marketing. In conclusion, I would argue that advertisements should be banned.

Accordingly

, it would be generally advisable for the government to advise the companies to use their resources in a more beneficial way.