some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Music

is considered not only as a kind of art but

also

takes part in societies as a cultural component.

Therefore

, communities use it for quite a wide range of purposes,

such

as bringing people from separated countries and generations together. How could it be effective?

This

is a controversial topic needed to argue.

Firstly

, different genres are supposed as a universal language

that is

not dependent on words. Given that, most people would agree that it has got the power to gather a mixed variety of people belonged various cultures and ages together,

such

as classical melody, which has become widely successful and popularized in the whole world, from Europe to Asia, and

also

influenced tens of thousands teenagers supplementary elderlies.

Hence

,

as a consequence

,

music

should be implied to enhance the sense of the relationship between countries and generations to reach an enriched and healthier world. Regarding the opponents, it seems that

although

music

has had an impressive impact on all populations, whether they speak Arabic or English or how old they are, separation continues.

For example

, plenty of Westerns are unheralded about East traditional pieces.

As well as

this

, Rock songs might be teased by elderlies when they confront children listening to their peculiar sounds. Despite the fact that some genres are advertised as worldly or agreed upon among families, others are ignored mostly. So,

music

may be a great communication way for certain classifications recognized by their ages or skin colours, but generation gap and racial diversity play their role negatively.

To conclude

, in my opinion, utilizing

music

as a bridge between notions that differed by their civilizations and peer groups is definitely beneficial.